‘This is the end of Hong Kong’: China pushes security law after unrest

In this Wednesday, 18 December 2019 file photo, pro-democracy activists hold up placards of Chinese President Xi Jinping with slogans including "End one party state" at a ferry terminal in Hong Kong. China's ceremonial parliament will consider legislation that could limit opposition activity in Hong Kong, a spokesperson said Thursday, 21 May 2020. AP


China’s parliament said it will introduce a proposal Friday (22 May 2020) for a national security law in Hong Kong at its annual session, in a move the US warned would be “highly destabilizing” for the financial hub.

The announcement late Thursday (21 May 2020) was quickly decried by pro-democracy lawmakers and activists as “the end of Hong Kong”, with fears it will stoke unrest and tighten Beijing’s grip on the semi-autonomous city.

China has made clear it wants new security legislation passed after Hong Kong was rocked by seven months of massive and sometimes violent pro-democracy protests last year.

The proposal, planned for the first day of the National People’s Congress, would strengthen “enforcement mechanisms” in the financial hub, the parliament’s spokesman Zhang Yesui said.

China’s parliament considers it “necessary to improve and uphold the ‘One Country, Two Systems’ policy,” Zhang said, referring to the arrangement that has underpinned the city’s liberties and free market economy.

Article 23 of Hong Kong’s mini-constitution, the Basic Law, -says the city must enact such laws to prohibit “treason, secession, sedition (and) subversion” against the Chinese government.


But the clause has never been implemented due to deeply held public fears it would curtail Hong Kong’s cherished civil rights.

The city enjoys freedoms unseen on the Chinese mainland which are protected by an agreement made before former colonial power Britain handed the territory back to Beijing in 1997.

An attempt to enact Article 23 in 2003 was shelved after half a million people took to the streets in protest.

The controversial bill has been put back on the table in recent years in response to the rise of the Hong Kong’s pro-democracy movement.

Zhang did not provide more details about the proposed law.

But if it is introduced to the NPC it is likely to be approved, as the body rubber-stamps decisions already made by Communist Party policymakers.

US State Department spokeswoman Morgan Ortagus warned that imposing such a law on Hong Kong would be “highly destabilising, and would be met with strong condemnation from the United States and the international community”.

President Donald Trump earlier Thursday also promised a response when told of the move on Hong Kong.

“I don’t know what it is, because nobody knows yet. If it happens, we’ll address that issue very strongly,” Trump said.

In this Thursday, 28 Nov 2019, file photo, a protester holds a placard showing bound hands during a demonstration in Hong Kong. AP

– ‘Zero respect’ –

Hong Kong’s largest pro-Beijing political party DAB was quick to voice its support for the “responsible move”.

But pro-democracy lawmakers were furious.

“This is the end of Hong Kong, this is the end of One Country, Two Systems, make no mistake about it,” Civic Party lawmaker Dennis Kwok told reporters.

Lawmaker Tanya Chan said Beijing had “shown zero respect for Hong Kong people” by attempting to enact the law without consultation.

“Many Hong Kongers must be as angry as us now, but we must remember not to give up,” she added.

Chris Patten, Hong Kong’s final British governor before the 1997 handover, said the proposal signaled a “comprehensive assault on the city’s autonomy” and would be “hugely damaging”.

Hong Kong has its own lawmaking body, the Legislative Council, or Legco.

But at least two Hong Kong deputies to the NPC have said they would propose the idea of introducing the law without going through the city’s legislature, using a mechanism provided for under the Basic Law.

“It indicates two possible things,” said Adam Ni, director of the Canberra-based China Policy Centre.

“First, Beijing does not believe that security law can make it through HK’s Legco, at least not without a major political storm, and second, protests and dissent has made the legislation of this law more urgent.”

Maya Wang, a senior China researcher for Human Rights Watch, also described the “alarming” move as “the end of Hong Kong”.

“#HongKong has been the safe harbour for dissent; it’s the light, the conscience, the voice that speaks truth to an increasingly powerful China,” she tweeted.

The US Congress late last year angered China by passing a law that would strip Hong Kong’s preferential trading status if it is no longer considered autonomous from the mainland.

The State Department warned Thursday that China’s actions could impact its decision on that status.

US senators on Thursday also introduced legislation to impose sanctions on any entity involved in curbing Hong Kong’s autonomy.

That could include police cracking down on demonstrators and Chinese officials involved in Hong Kong policy ― as well as banks that conduct transactions with anyone involved in curbing the territory’s freedoms.

Senator Pat Toomey, who spearheaded the legislation, described Hong Kong as “the canary in the coal mine for Asia”.

“Beijing’s growing interference could have a chilling effect on other nations struggling for freedom in China’s shadow,” he said. (AFP)


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here